SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Maluki v Tiny Totos Kenya Limited (Cause E317 of 2020) [2022] KEELRC 13359 (KLR) (1 December 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELRC 13359 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
13359
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 13359 (KLR)
Decided
1 December 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor DisputePostureAppeal from a decision of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramMN NDUMA
The court upheld the objection and excluded the audio recordings and phone call transcript from the trial.

Facts

The claimant, John Makaau Maluki, sought to introduce audio recordings and a phone call transcript as evidence in a labor dispute against the respondent, Tiny Totos Kenya Limited. The respondent objected to the introduction of these documents, claiming they were illegally obtained.

Issues

  • Whether the audio recordings and phone call transcript were illegally obtained and thus inadmissible as evidence.
  • Whether the court should uphold the objection and exclude the documents from the trial.

Reasoning

The court found the recordings were illegally obtained without notifying the respondent's representatives and the information in the certificates of electronic recording was insufficient.

Outcome

The court ruled in favor of the respondent, excluding the disputed evidence.

Orders

  • The audio recordings and phone call transcript dated July 9, 2020 and July 26, 2021 are expunged from the record and excluded from the evidence before court.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Evidence Act, Cap 80 Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (2)
  • RC -vs- KKR [2021] eKLR
  • Presidential Election Petition No 4 of 2017 - Njonjo Mue & another -vs- Chairperson of Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission and 3 others [2017] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case