SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Tome & another v Bungoma County Assembly Service Board (CASB) & 9 others; Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (Interested Party) (Employment and Labour Relations Petition E007 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 1337 (KLR) (18 May 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELRC 1337 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1337
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 1337 (KLR)
Decided
18 May 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment and Labour Relations PetitionPostureAppeal from original trialCoramJW KELI
Holding

The court allowed the application to expedite the disposal of the Notice of Motion and ordered the amended undated Notice of Motion to be heard first.

Facts

The Petitioners filed an urgent application seeking a temporary conservatory order and a declaration that the recruitment and deployment of 55 persons without adequate budgetary allocation of funds is a violation of the Constitution.

Issues

  1. Advertised 55 job vacancies in the County Assembly of Bungoma in contravention of Articles 2, 10, 73, 201, 207 and 232 of the Constitution of Kenya.
  2. Enforcement of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 under Sections 3, 10, 22 and 258.
  3. Contravention of the Fiscal Responsibility Principles between the Petitioners and Respondents

Reasoning

The court allowed the application due to the Petitioner's lack of understanding of court case management processes and the error in the record.

Outcome

The application was allowed, and the directions of the Court of 29th November 2021 were vacated.

Orders

  • The application is allowed.
  • The amended undated Notice of Motion received in court on 2nd November 2022 to be heard first.
  • Costs in the cause.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Public Finance Management Act, 2012
  • Public Finance Management (County Governments) Regulations 2015
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case