SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Teacher Service Commission; Shianzwi (Interested Party) (Judicial Review 2 of 2022) [2022] KEELRC 13378 (KLR) (1 December 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELRC 13378 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
13378
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 13378 (KLR)
Decided
1 December 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte Chamber Summons ApplicationCoramJW KELI
Leave to seek a Certiorari order is declined, and the entire exparte Chamber Summons is dismissed with costs to the Respondent.

Facts

The Respondent dismissed the Interested Party from employment on December 10, 2020, and the decision was upheld on March 9, 2022. The Applicant sought judicial review of the dismissal decision.

Issues

  • Whether the Applicant's application for leave to seek a Certiorari order was timely.
  • Whether the Applicant's application for an order of Mandamus was valid given the dismissed order was still in place.

Reasoning

The court found that the dismissal decision was made on December 10, 2020, and the application for leave to seek a Certiorari order was outside the six-month period. The court also held that the Order of Mandamus sought was hinged on the Order of Certiorari, which was unmerited.

Outcome

The suit is struck out, and the Applicant is free to file a normal claim within the statutory limitation.

Orders

  • Leave to seek a Certiorari order is declined.
  • The entire exparte Chamber Summons is dismissed with costs to the Respondent.

Remedies

  • None

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Union Procedure Rules
  • Law Reform Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Pastoli v Leabale District & others (2008) 2 EA
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case