SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Achola Jaoko & Co. Advocates v Odera (Miscellaneous Case 5 of 2019) [2022] KEELRC 13490 (KLR) (7 December 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELRC 13490 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
13490
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 13490 (KLR)
Decided
7 December 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTaxation of Advocates BillPostureApplication for Taxation of Advocates BillCoramAN MWAURE
Holding

The court enters judgment in favor of the applicant for Kshs 113,204/- together with interest at court rates from the date of judgment till full payment as per the certificate of taxation dated November 8, 2019.

Facts

The applicant, Achola Jaoko & Co. Advocates, filed a notice of motion for taxation of an advocate's bill for Kshs 113,284. The respondent, Philip Odera, disputed the taxation but did not dispute the retainer of the advocates' services.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's bill of costs should be taxed
  2. Whether the respondent should be ordered to pay the costs of the application

Reasoning

The court relied on section 51 of the Advocates Act, which provides that the court may make an order for the taxation of an advocate's bill and may enter judgment for the sum certified to be due with costs.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the applicant

Orders

  • Judgment for the applicant for Kshs 113,204/- together with interest at court rates from the date of judgment till full payment as per the certificate of taxation dated November 8, 2019
  • Award of costs to the applicant

Remedies

  • Judgment for the applicant for Kshs 113,204/- together with interest at court rates from the date of judgment till full payment as per the certificate of taxation dated November 8, 2019
  • Award of costs to the applicant
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case