SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyariro v Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Ltd (Cause E053 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 1475 (KLR) (30 June 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELRC 1475 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1475
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 1475 (KLR)
Decided
30 June 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant seeks reinstatement and damages, Respondent denies claimCoramCN BAARI
The termination was unfair as the Claimant was not afforded procedural fairness as required by Section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007.

Facts

Claimant was employed by Respondent from 2005 as a casual labourer, then on fixed-term contracts until 2017, when he was employed on permanent terms as an artisan mate assistant. He was terminated in October 2020 for replacing 246 non-vending meters.

Issues

  • Whether the termination was unfair
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The court found that the Respondent did not comply with the statutory requirements of Section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007, which mandates the employer to explain the reason for termination, allow representation, and hear the employee's explanations.

Outcome

The Claimant is not entitled to reinstatement or damages, but the Respondent is ordered to pay the retained sum of the unreturned meters.

Orders

  • The Claimant is not entitled to reinstatement or damages
  • The Respondent is ordered to pay the retained sum of the unreturned meters

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Fair Administrative Actions Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Felix Mbolonzi Kiok v Director of Public Prosecutions (2020) eKLR
  • Charles Njagi V Air Connection Limited (2016) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case