SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kazungu v Navistat Telematics Ltd (Cause E067 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 1648 (KLR) (20 June 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELRC 1648 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1648
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 1648 (KLR)
Decided
20 June 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair and Unlawful TerminationPostureRespondent's Application for Summary JudgmentCoramAK NZEI
Holding

The Court will mention the suit for pre-trial directions on June 20, 2022.

Facts

The Claimant was employed as an Accountant by the Respondent from April 1, 2015. In 2018, the Claimant was informed by the Chief Executive Officer that he should only report to work when instructed by the company. The Respondent did not pay the Claimant for the months of April, May, June, and July 2018 and has not paid him since. The Claimant reported the matter to the Mombasa Labour Office, but the Respondent did not resolve the issue. The Claimant was arrested in July 2018 and charged with stealing by servant, but the charge was withdrawn without a witness. The Respondent did not allow the Claimant to report to work or pay him during the time it took for the Claimant to be discharged.

Issues

  1. Unfair and unlawful termination of employment
  2. Constructive dismissal
  3. Non-payment of salary

Reasoning

The Court will consider the pre-trial directions to determine the appropriate course of action.

Outcome

The suit will be mentioned in Court for pre-trial directions on June 20, 2022.

Orders

  • The suit will be mentioned in Court in 20th June 2022 for purposes of taking pre-trial directions.
  • Orders accordingly.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case