SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ndung’u Kiarie v Weithaga Farm Extension Limited [2022] KEELRC 292 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 292 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
292
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 292 (KLR)
Decided
21 April 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramNduma
The Court finds the Claimant's evidence regarding dates unsafe to rely on and concludes that the Claimant absconded duty on 14th October 2013.

Facts

The Claimant, Ndung’u Kiarie, alleged unlawful/unfair dismissal and non-payment of terminal dues and compensatory damages from the Respondent, Weithaga Farm Extension Limited. The Claimant was employed as a tractor driver from June 21, 2010, and the dispute arose after he was allegedly reprimanded for carrying workers in the tractor trailer.

Issues

  • When was the Claimant employed?
  • Whether the Claimant's employment was terminated by the Respondent or he absconded duty?
  • Whether the Claimant deserves the prayers sought.

Reasoning

The Court relies on the Employment Act, 2007, and previous court decisions to determine that the Claimant absconded duty, not being terminated.

Outcome

The Claimant's claims are dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (4)
  • Pius Machafu Isindu v Lavington Security Guards Limited [2017] eKLR
  • Naima Khamis v Oxford University Press [EA] Ltd [2017] eKLR
  • Felistas Acheha Ikatwa v Charles Peter Otieno (supra)
  • Joseph Nzioka v Smart (supra)
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case