SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sum v Agriculture and Food Authority (Employment and Labour Relations Claim E019 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 3847 (KLR) (28 July 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELRC 3847 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3847
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 3847 (KLR)
Decided
28 July 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment and Labour Relations ClaimPostureRespondent/Applicant's Notice of motion seeking stay of execution of judgment and stay of appealCoramHS WASILWA
Holding

The application is granted on the condition that the Respondent/Applicant deposits the entire decretal sum plus costs within 60 days in a joint interest earning account held in the joint names of the Counsel on record. In default, execution may proceed.

Facts

The Respondent/Applicant is dissatisfied with the judgment of the court delivered on May 17, 2022, which awarded the Claimant Kshs 924,000 plus costs and interest. The Respondent/Applicant intends to file an appeal.

Issues

  1. Stay of execution of judgment pending appeal
  2. Stay of execution of costs pending appeal

Reasoning

The court allowed the application due to the Respondent/Applicant's dissatisfaction with the judgment and their intention to file an appeal, but with the condition of depositing the decretal sum plus costs.

Outcome

Application granted with conditions

Orders

  • Stay of execution of judgment pending appeal
  • Stay of execution of costs pending appeal

Remedies

  • Deposit of decretal sum plus costs within 60 days in a joint interest earning account held in the joint names of the Counsel on record
  • Execution may proceed in default

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Republic v Commissioner for Investigations and Enforcement Ex parte Wananchi Group Kenya Limited (2014) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case