SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ratemo v Uzuri Foods Limited (Cause 1724 of 2017) [2022] KEELRC 3889 (KLR) (16 September 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELRC 3889 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3889
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 3889 (KLR)
Decided
16 September 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramSC RUTTO
Holding

The court found that the respondent had a valid reason to dismiss the claimant, as evidenced by the overall being traced to Tony, who the claimant admitted giving out an overall to. The claimant was found culpable and was ordered to pay one month's salary in lieu of notice and interest on the award.

Facts

The claimant, Jared Nyakweba Ratemo, was employed by Uzuri Foods Limited as a boiler operator. He was dismissed on October 15, 2016, on the grounds of stealing an overall belonging to his colleague Matthew Kyalo. The claimant denied taking the overall and claimed his dismissal was unfair.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent had a valid and fair reason to dismiss the claimant from employment
  2. Whether the respondent complied with the procedural requirements in eecting the claimant’s dismissal
  3. Is the claimant entitled to the reliefs sought?

Reasoning

The court determined that the claimant was culpable for the loss of the overall, as he admitted to giving it to his friend Tony and admitted to Tony buying him lunch. The court found that the respondent had a valid reason to dismiss the claimant.

Outcome

The claimant was ordered to pay one month's salary in lieu of notice and interest on the award.

Orders

  • One (1) month's salary in lieu of notice being Kshs 20,300.00.
  • The total award is Kshs 81,200.00.
  • Interest on the amount in (c) at court rates from the date of judgement until payment in full.

Remedies

  • The claimant shall also have the costs of the suit.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case