SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Daniel Muthoka Muindi v Intex Constructions Co.Ltd [2022] KEELRC 392 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 392 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
392
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 392 (KLR)
Decided
23 March 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a decision of the Principal MagistrateCoramD.K.Njagi Marete
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent. The learned Principal Magistrate's decision is upheld.

Facts

The appellant, Daniel Muthoka Muindi, was arrested and charged with fraud by the National Social Security Fund (NSSF). He was subsequently dismissed by the respondent, Intex Constructions Co. Ltd, without a fair hearing. The appellant claims the dismissal was unlawful and seeks damages.

Issues

  1. Whether the learned Principal Magistrate erred in law and facts by failing to appreciate the appellant's evidence
  2. Whether the learned Principal Magistrate erred in law and facts by failing to consider the respondent's oral testimony
  3. Whether the learned Principal Magistrate erred in law and facts by not finding the respondent's action to terminate the appellant's job as unlawful
  4. Whether the learned Principal Magistrate erred in law and facts by not finding the respondent in breach of his employment
  5. Whether the learned Principal Magistrate erred in law and facts for not ordering the respondent to pay the appellant damages and costs
  6. Whether the learned Principal Magistrate erred in law and facts for not ordering the respondent to compensate the appellant Kshs.15,000 he deposited at the police station
  7. Whether the learned Principal Magistrate erred in law and facts for finding the respondent entitled to summary dismissal without a fair hearing or justified offence
  8. Whether the learned Trial Magistrate erred in law and facts for admitting the respondent's evidence without any documentary evidence

Reasoning

The court found that the learned Principal Magistrate's decision was supported by evidence and the law, and that the appellant's case was dismissed for justifiable grounds of misconduct.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011
Cases cited (2)
  • Oserian Development Company Limited v Jackson Oteyo Sila (2018) eKLR
  • Peters v Sunday Post Ltd (1958) EA 424
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case