SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Marango & 122 others v Kedong Ranch Limited (Petition E009 of 2020) [2022] KEELRC 4144 (KLR) (29 September 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELRC 4144 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
4144
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 4144 (KLR)
Decided
29 September 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureRespondent/applicant seeks stay of execution of judgment and stay of appealCoramH. S. WASILWA, HON. LADY JUSTICE HELLEN WASILWA
Stay of execution of judgment granted on condition that applicants deposit the entire decretal sum in an interest-earning account within 60 days

Facts

Respondent/applicant seeks stay of execution of judgment and stay of appeal due to dissatisfaction with the judgment and decree of the court

Issues

  • Stay of execution of judgment
  • Stay of appeal

Reasoning

The court granted the stay of execution on condition that the applicants deposit the entire decretal sum in an interest-earning account held in joint names of counsel on record within 60 days, to avoid a miscarriage of justice.

Outcome

Stay of execution granted

Orders

  • Stay of execution of judgment granted
  • Stay of appeal granted

Remedies

  • Security deposit of the entire decretal sum in an interest-earning account held in joint names of counsel on record within 60 days

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case