SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Abdi Mohammed Abdi & another v Fayaz Bakers Limited & another [2022] KEELRC 453 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 453 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Case number
453
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 453 (KLR)
Decided
10 March 2022
Judge
AK Nzei
Parties
raw · defendants · plaintiffs
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureRespondent's Motion to Dismiss for Want of ProsecutionCoramAGNES KITIKU NZEI
Holding

The suit is dismissed with no orders as to costs, and the Claimants are ordered to prosecute the suit within six (6) months from the date of this Ruling, failing which the suit shall stand dismissed.

Facts

The suit was initially filed on 106 of 2018 and adjourned several times. The Claimants were ordered to pay costs of Ksh.2000 before the next hearing date. The suit was adjourned again on 4th May 2020 due to the pandemic, and the Claimants were ready to proceed with the hearing on 4th May 2020 but the Court was not sitting. The pandemic caused further delays.

Issues

  1. Want of prosecution of the suit
  2. Negligence of the Claimants

Reasoning

The Court dismissed the suit for want of prosecution due to the Claimants' inaction from 4th May 2020 to 22nd July 2021, despite the pandemic causing delays. The Court noted that the Claimants had previously taken reasonable steps towards prosecution.

Outcome

Dismissal of the suit

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 16th July 2021 is hereby dismissed with no orders as to costs.
  • The Claimants shall prosecute the suit herein within six (6) months from the date of this Ruling, failing which the suit shall stand dismissed.
  • The suit shall be mentioned in Court for appropriate directions and for fixing of a hearing date on 30/3/2022.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case