SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Oleshetiti v Astral Industries Limited (Cause 1979 of 2017) [2022] KEELRC 4855 (KLR) (22 September 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELRC 4855 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
4855
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 4855 (KLR)
Decided
22 September 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramJK GAKERI, See Ndolo
The court found the termination of the claimant's employment to be unfair due to the respondent's failure to comply with the redundancy process as prescribed by the Employment Act, 2007.

Facts

The claimant, Enock Molenje Oleshetiti, alleged unfair termination of his employment by Astral Industries Limited on June 13, 2016. He claimed he was employed on June 25, 2013, and was underpaid and denied leave and house allowance. The respondent denied these allegations and claimed the claimant was employed under a fixed-term contract from January 4, 2016.

Issues

  • Whether termination of employment was fair
  • When the claimant was employed by the respondent
  • Whether the claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The court determined that the termination was unfair because the respondent did not comply with the redundancy process outlined in the Employment Act, 2007, and the claimant's employment date was found to be November 1, 2014.

Outcome

The claimant's termination was found to be unfair, and he was ordered to be paid for the period he was out of employment, his benefits, notice pay, pro rata leave, and severance pay.

Orders

  • The claimant is ordered to be paid for the period he was out of employment
  • The claimant is ordered to be paid his benefits, notice pay, pro rata leave, and severance pay

Remedies

  • Payment for the period of unemployment
  • Benefits, notice pay, pro rata leave, and severance pay

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (2)
  • Naima Khamis v Oxford University Press (EA) Ltd (2017) eKLR
  • Walter Ogal Anuro v Teachers Service Commission (2013) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case