SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Stella Mukwana Siboko & another v Style Industries Limited [2022] KEELRC 769 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 769 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
769
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 769 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramCounsel Njuru
The court found that the contracts were not fixed-term contracts and that the termination was unfair.

Facts

Stella Mukwana Siboko and Rose Wambui Kimani sued Style Industries Limited for unfair termination of their employment contracts. The contracts were alleged to be fixed-term contracts that expired on May 31, 2017.

Issues

  • Nature of the employment contracts
  • Unfair termination of employment contracts
  • Reliefs available to the claimants
  • Costs of the suit

Reasoning

The court determined that the contracts were not fixed-term contracts as the Respondent failed to produce written contracts to demonstrate the nature of the employment. The court also found the termination to be unfair.

Outcome

The court dismissed the claims for unfair termination and ordered the Respondent to pay terminal benefits and interest.

Orders

  • The Respondent is ordered to pay terminal benefits of Kshs. 368,138.00 to the Claimants.
  • The Respondent is ordered to pay interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full.
  • The Respondent is ordered to pay the costs of the suit.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case