SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenneth Ndigirigi Gitau v Tangerine Investments Limited [2022] KEELRC 806 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 806 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
806
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 806 (KLR)
Decided
15 February 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair TerminationPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramHon. Lady Justice Maureen Onyango
The Employment Act was violated as the termination was unfair.

Facts

The Claimant, Kenneth Ndigirigi Gitau, was employed by the Respondent, Tangerine Investments Limited, from June 1, 2013, until November 27, 2015. The Respondent terminated his employment on November 27, 2015, citing non-performance. The Claimant alleged unfair termination and sought compensation.

Issues

  • Unfair termination of employment
  • Calculation of compensation

Reasoning

The court found that the termination was unfair due to the lack of a fair procedure and valid reason, as per Section 41 and 45(2) of the Employment Act.

Outcome

The suit was dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Award of Kshs.50,389 for November 2015 salary
  • Award of Kshs.50,389 for one month's salary in lieu of notice
  • Award of 25 days' leave in the sum of Kshs.48,451
  • No award for house allowance or unpaid commission

Remedies

  • Compensation for November 2015 salary
  • One month's salary in lieu of notice
  • 25 days' leave

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case