SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kipketer v Teachers Service Commission (Cause 147 of 2018) [2022] KEELRC 85 (KLR) (8 June 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELRC 85 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
85
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 85 (KLR)
Decided
8 June 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramABUODHA, NJ ABUODHA
The court grants the respondent unconditional stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Facts

The applicant, Monicah Jepkorir Kipketer, sought orders for a stay of execution of the judgment and consequential orders pending the appeal. The respondent, Teachers Service Commission, opposed the application.

Issues

  • Whether the applicant has an arguable appeal with high chances of success
  • Whether the intended appeal raises weighty issues of law and will render the judgment nugatory if a stay of execution is not granted
  • Whether the applicant will suffer irreparable loss and damage if the judgment is enforced
  • Whether the applicant has demonstrated the threshold for stay of execution pending appeal

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant has not demonstrated an arguable appeal and that the respondent has not demonstrated the resources to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeds. The court granted the stay of execution.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Unconditional stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • National Industrial Credit Bank Ltd. -v- Aquires Frameis Wasike & Another [2006] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case