SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Clerk, County Assembly of Homa Bay & another [2022] KEELRC 871 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 871 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
871
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 871 (KLR)
Decided
9 February 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureRespondents' Motion for Orders to Vacate/Dismiss Ex-Parte InjunctionsCoramRADIDO STEPHEN, MCIArb
The Court vacates the ex-parte injunctions and orders them to be pending the inter-partes hearing of the Motion and/or further orders of the Court.

Facts

The applicant, Hon Elizabeth Ayoo, was invited to respond to a Notice of Intention to remove her from the office of Speaker of Homa Bay County Assembly. She subsequently filed a Motion for Injunctions, which the Court granted. The Respondents then sought to vacate the injunctions.

Issues

  • Validity of ex-parte injunctions
  • Computation of time for ex-parte injunctions

Reasoning

The Court agrees with the applicant that the 14-day period for ex-parte injunctions had lapsed, and the orders should be pending the substantive Motion.

Outcome

The ex-parte injunctions are vacated and ordered to be pending the inter-partes hearing of the Motion.

Orders

  • Amendment of the injunctive orders to be pending the inter-partes hearing of the Motion and/or further orders of the Court

Remedies

  • Reinstatement of the applicant's status quo pending the determination of the substantive Motion

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (1)
  • Director of Public Prosecutions v Justus Mwendwa Kthenge & 2 Ors (2016) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case