West Kenya Sugar Co Ltd v Sostine Salamba Milimo [2022] KEELRC 957 (KLR)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 957
- Citation
- [2022] KEELRC 957 (KLR)
- Decided
- 27 January 2022
Summary at a glance
TypeAppealPostureNotice of Motion application for leave to appeal out of time, stay of execution, and stay of appealCoramJ. W. KELI
The court grants leave to the Applicant to file an appeal out of time, as the Applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and has good and sufficient cause.
Facts
The Respondent's appeal was struck out by the High Court for being filed in the wrong court. The Applicant filed an application to transfer the case to the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC). The Applicant then filed an appeal in the ELRC, which was also struck out for the same reason.
Issues
- Whether the court should grant leave to the Applicant to file an appeal out of time.
- Whether the depositions made by the Appellant's counsel should be admitted by the court.
- Whether the Applicant stands to suffer loss if the stay of execution is not granted.
- Who shall bear costs of this application.
Reasoning
The court considers the oxygen principle and the provisions of the Civil Procedure Act, finding that the Applicant has complied with the requirements and explained the delay satisfactorily.
Outcome
The court grants leave to appeal out of time.
Orders
- Grant leave to appeal out of time.
- Grant stay of execution of the decree in BUTALI SRMCC NO. 107 OF 2015 SOSTINE SALAMBA MILIMO V WEST KENYA SUGAR CO. LTD.
- Grant stay of execution of the decree in BUTALI SRMCC NO. 107 OF 2015 SOSTINE SALAMBA MILIMO V WEST KENYA SUGAR CO. LTD.
- Admit intended appeal out of time.
- Grant leave to file appeal out of time.
- Grant stay of execution of the decree in BUTALI SRMCC NO. 107 OF 2015 SOSTINE SALAMBA MILIMO V WEST KENYA SUGAR CO. LTD.
- Grant stay of execution of the decree in BUTALI SRMCC NO. 107 OF 2015 SOSTINE SALAMBA MILIMO V WEST KENYA SUGAR CO. LTD.
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…