SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Pius Sitati Mabaku v Devyani Food Industries Kenya Limited (Formerly Sameer Agriculture and Livestock Limited) [2022] KEELRC 983 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 983 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
983
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 983 (KLR)
Decided
26 January 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureRespondent's Motion for Summary JudgmentCoramNyamu, Nzioki Wa Makau, Onyango, Radido
The Court finds that the Respondent has discharged the burden of proof that it had a valid and fair reason to terminate the contract of service.

Facts

Claimant was employed as a Dispatch Supervisor by Respondent from September 29, 2015 to September 30, 2018. Claimant was terminated on October 28, 2016 without justification or fair hearing. Claimant alleged the termination was unfair and sought compensation.

Issues

  • Whether the termination was fair
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondent had a valid reason for terminating the contract due to the loss of 184 cartons of stock. The procedural steps were not followed as required by the Employment Act.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (5)
  • Walter Ogal Anuro v Teachers Service Commission
  • Naima Khamis v Oxford University Press (EA) Limited
  • Loice Otieno v Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd
  • Samuel Mwangi Wachinga v Endarasha Farmers' Co-operative Society
  • Elizabeth Mokuhi Kimondo v Karangi Coftea Limited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case