SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Plantation Agricultural Workers Union v Sirgoek Flowers Limited (Cause E004 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 3344 (KLR) (21 December 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 3344 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3344
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 3344 (KLR)
Decided
21 December 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour Relations DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramMA ONYANGO
Holding

The effective date of the 2016-2018 CBA is set to be April 1, 2016, and the employees are entitled to a 20% wage increase.

Facts

The Kenya Plantation Agricultural Workers Union (Claimant) negotiated a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) with Sirgoek Flowers Limited (Respondent) in 2015. The CBA was to be effective from April 1, 2014, and last for two years. The CBA expired on April 1, 2016, and the parties agreed to negotiate a new CBA. The Claimant sought a wage increase and the registration of a new CBA.

Issues

  1. Effective date of the 2016-2018 CBA
  2. Whether the employees are entitled to a 20% wage increase

Reasoning

The court considered various factors, including the cost of living and the ability of the industry to pay a full living wage, before determining the wage increase.

Outcome

The court granted the Claimant's request for a 20% wage increase and ordered the Respondent to conclude, sign, and register a new CBA with the Claimant Union.

Orders

  • Ordering the effective date of the 2016-2018 CBA to be April 1, 2016

Remedies

  • 20% wage increase for the employees
  • Order to conclude, sign, and register a new CBA

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Labour Relations Act
  • Industrial Court Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Mukiria Farmers' Co-operative Society Ltd v Jacob Rukaria & 5 others [2017] eKLR
  • Industrial Court at Nairobi Cause Number 89 of 1966
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case