SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Shoe and Leather Workers Union v Techno-Plast Limited (Cause E781 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 100 (KLR) (1 February 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELRC 100 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
100
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 100 (KLR)
Decided
1 February 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor DisputePostureAppeal from a decision to dismiss a motion for reinstatement and costsCoramDR. JACOB GAKERI
The court dismissed the union's motion and ordered the parties to bear their own costs.

Facts

The Kenya Shoe and Leather Workers Union filed a motion seeking orders to restrain Techno-Plast Limited from recruiting new employees and to reinstate declared redundant employees. The Respondent claimed that the employees were not declared redundant and that the union's motion was premature.

Issues

  • Whether the union's motion was premature
  • Whether the Respondent breached the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) by declaring employees redundant
  • Whether the Respondent should be ordered to pay costs

Reasoning

The court found that the union's motion was premature as the conciliation process had not concluded, and the Respondent did not breach the CBA by declaring employees redundant. The court also ruled that the issue of reinstatement should go to full trial.

Outcome

The union's motion was dismissed.

Orders

  • The court dismissed the union's motion

Remedies

  • The parties shall bear their own costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya)
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case