SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Chic Fashions Limited v Maundu (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E136 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 1043 (KLR) (25 April 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 1043 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1043
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1043 (KLR)
Decided
25 April 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour Relations AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment declaring wrongful and unfair termination of employmentCoramMN NDUMA
The court found the termination unlawful and unfair, and awarded compensation and interest.

Facts

Chic Fashions Limited terminated the employment of Maundu on July 3, 2020, without providing a letter of termination or a disciplinary hearing. Maundu claimed he was a casual employee, while the company argued he was a permanent employee.

Issues

  • Whether the termination was lawful and fair
  • Whether the deeming of Maundu as a monthly paid employee was a misdirection of law and fact
  • What remedy should be provided to the company

Reasoning

The court considered the evidence and found that Maundu was a casual employee, not a permanent one, leading to the wrongful termination.

Outcome

Affirmed the judgment of the trial court

Remedies

  • Compensation of Kshs.14,700.00 in lieu of notice
  • Compensation of Kshs.176,400.00 for twelve months' salary
  • Interest at court rates from the date of judgment till payment in full
  • Costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case