Kitaa v Aga Khan Education Services (Cause 126 of 2017) [2024] KEELRC 1106 (KLR) (8 May 2024) (Judgment)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 1106
- Citation
- [2024] KEELRC 1106 (KLR)
- Decided
- 8 May 2024
Summary at a glance
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramMA ONYANGO
The Claimant's terms were not covered by the CBA, and the termination met both procedural and substantive tests. The Claimant is not entitled to any of the prayers sought.
Facts
Kitaa was employed as a messenger and later promoted to Support Sta Supervisor. He was terminated for allegedly losing store items and failing to respond to show cause letters.
Issues
- Whether the Claimant's terms of employment were covered by the CBA
- Whether the termination met both procedural and substantive tests
- Whether the Claimant is entitled to any of the prayers sought
Reasoning
The CBA did not cover the Claimant's terms of employment. The termination met both procedural and substantive tests, but the Claimant is not entitled to any of the prayers sought.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…