SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kyalo v National Bank of Kenya Limited (Cause E669 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 119 (KLR) (2 February 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELRC 119 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
119
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 119 (KLR)
Decided
2 February 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant's Application for Injunction and Restraining OrdersCoramJAMES RIKA
Holding

The Court finds a real danger of the Claimant falling into default on his loan repayment if the proposed change is implemented. The Court orders the Respondent to continue applying the preferential interest rate of 4.5% per annum to both of the Claimant’s mortgage facilities and restrains the Respondent from applying any commercial interest rate.

Facts

Claimant was employed as a Networks Manager by Respondent Bank. His contract was terminated on 11th July 2023. The Respondent proposed to apply a commercial interest rate of 13.5% per annum to his two mortgage facilities, which would increase his monthly instalments from Kshs. 128,589 to Kshs. 236,795. Claimant sought a permanent injunction to prevent this change.

Issues

  1. Fairness of termination
  2. Applicability of preferential interest rate

Reasoning

The Court considers the termination unfair and unlawful, and the loans were intended as employment benefits. The Court orders the status quo to continue until the claim is heard and determined.

Outcome

Claimant's Application granted

Orders

  • Respondent to continue applying preferential interest rate of 4.5% per annum
  • Restraining the Respondent from applying any commercial interest rate

Remedies

  • Permanent injunction to prevent application of commercial interest rate
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case