SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wafula & 2 others v Public Service Commission & 4 others; Law Society of Kenya & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Petition E218, E217 & E226 of 2023 (Consolidated)) [2024] KEELRC 1283 (KLR) (24 May 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 1283 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1283
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1283 (KLR)
Decided
24 May 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureAppeal from a decision of the Public Service CommissionCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The delay in appointing the successful candidate was unlawful and contravened constitutional rights

Facts

The Public Service Commission advertised a vacancy for the position of Chief Land Registrar, and the successful candidate was Dr. Mburu Peter Ng’ang’a. However, the Principal Secretary delayed implementing the appointment, and Mr. David Nyamaso Nyandoro was appointed instead.

Issues

  • Deliberate delay in implementing the Public Service Commission's decision
  • Appointment of the wrong candidate

Reasoning

The court found that the delay was without justifiable reason and violated the rights to fair labour practices and fair administrative action.

Outcome

Judicial review order of mandamus issued

Orders

  • Principal Secretary and Cabinet Secretary to fully implement the Public Service Commission's decision

Remedies

  • Appointment of Dr. Mburu Peter Ng’ang’a as Chief Land Registrar

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case