SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ngugi v Orient Sacco Society Limited (Cause 154 of 2020) [2024] KEELRC 1304 (KLR) (29 May 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 1304 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1304
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1304 (KLR)
Decided
29 May 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSummary Dismissal and CompensationPostureClaimant's AppealCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
Holding

The claimant's claim for compensation and notice pay will collapse due to gross misconduct. The suit is determined with orders for the respondent to deliver the certificate of service within 21 days and each party to bear their own costs.

Facts

The claimant, John Mwangi Ngugi, was employed as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Orient Sacco Society Limited from December 17, 2012, until his summary dismissal on March 13, 2017. The claimant alleged unlawful dismissal without notice and salary arrears. The respondent, Orient Sacco Society Limited, claimed a loan owed, surcharge, and costs.

Issues

  1. Unfair dismissal
  2. Salary arrears
  3. House allowance
  4. Service pay
  5. Severance payment
  6. Accrued annual leave
  7. Certificate of service

Reasoning

The court found that the claimant absconded and was on suspension during the period in question, establishing culpability. The claimant failed to provide salary account statements and justified claims for house allowance, service pay, and accrued annual leave.

Outcome

The claimant's claims for compensation and notice pay will collapse. The suit is determined with orders for the respondent to deliver the certificate of service within 21 days and each party to bear their own costs.

Orders

  • The respondent to deliver the certificate of service within 21 days from today.
  • Each party to bear own costs of the suit.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Cooperative Societies Act, Cap 490
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case