SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

SGA Security Solutions Limited v Mugenya (Appeal E126 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 13214 (KLR) (22 November 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 13214 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
13214
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 13214 (KLR)
Decided
22 November 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Mombasa Chief Magistrate's CourtCoramAGNES KITIKU NZEI
The Appellant’s dismissal of the Respondent was found to be unfair and wrongful. The Respondent was awarded compensation for unfair termination of employment and one month salary in lieu of notice.

Facts

The Respondent, Kelvin Odhiambo Mugenya, was employed by the Appellant, SGA Security Solutions Limited, as a driver on permanent basis. He was dismissed on 11th December, 2020, without notice, and without a fair hearing. The Respondent claimed unfair dismissal, unpaid salary, house allowance, leave days, overtime, and service pay.

Issues

  • Whether the dismissal was unfair and wrongful
  • Whether the Respondent was entitled to unpaid salary, house allowance, leave days, overtime, and service pay

Reasoning

The court found that the Respondent was dismissed without a fair hearing and without following due procedure, thus the dismissal was unfair and wrongful.

Outcome

In favor of the Respondent

Orders

  • The Appellant is ordered to pay the Respondent compensation for unfair termination of employment in the amount of Kshs.222,658.52
  • The Appellant is ordered to pay the Respondent one month salary in lieu of notice in the amount of Kshs.31,808.36
  • The awarded sum shall be subject to statutory deductions pursuant to Section 49(2) of the Employment Act
  • The Respondent is awarded interest on the awarded sum, to be calculated at court rates from the date of the trial Court’s Judgment
  • Each party will bear its own costs of the appeal, but the Respondent is awarded costs of the primary suit and the Appellant’s Counter-claim which I have dismissed

Remedies

  • Compensation for unfair termination of employment
  • One month salary in lieu of notice

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case