SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Odindo & 13 others v County Government of Kisumu (Judicial Review E024 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 13340 (KLR) (5 December 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELRC 13340 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
13340
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 13340 (KLR)
Decided
5 December 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplicant seeks mandamus orders against the County Government of Kisumu to pay retirees' duesCoramJK GAKERI
Holding

The Court finds the County Government breached the applicants' legitimate expectation and issues an order of mandamus to compel payment

Facts

The applicants are retirees of a defunct local authority in Kisumu. They claim the County Assembly of Kisumu allocated Kshs.16,000,000 for their payment in the 2022/2023 budget, but the funds have not been disbursed.

Issues

  1. Legitimate expectation of payment
  2. Non-payment of dues

Reasoning

The Court relies on previous judicial decisions to establish that legitimate expectation can arise from a public authority's practice or representation, and that the County Assembly's budgetary provision for the applicants' payment was a fulfillment of that expectation.

Outcome

The Court directs the County Government to pay the applicants Kshs.16,000,000 and bears the costs of the application

Orders

  • Order of mandamus to compel payment of Kshs.16,000,000

Remedies

  • Payment of Kshs.16,000,000

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Public Finance Management Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Orange Democratic Movement v Cabinet Secretary National Treasury
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case