SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Chakaya v Meat Magic Enterprises Limited (Appeal E036 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 13451 (KLR) (16 December 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 13451 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
13451
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 13451 (KLR)
Decided
16 December 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureFirst AppealCoramM MBARŨ, J
Holding

The appeal is upheld, and the judgment is set aside. The claim for terminal dues, including service pay, unpaid leave, public holidays, and salary arrears, is granted.

Facts

The appellant, Daniel Muweye Chakaya, claimed he was employed by the respondent, Meat Magic Enterprises Limited, as a salesperson from July 2017 until 31 May 2022. He sought terminal dues including service pay, unpaid leave, public holidays, salary arrears, overtime, and costs.

Issues

  1. Employment termination and entitlement to terminal dues
  2. Service pay
  3. Unpaid leave
  4. Public holidays and overtime work
  5. Salary arrears

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent failed to submit work records and statutory payments, which denied the court crucial records. The court also ruled that the appellant was entitled to service pay, unpaid leave, and salary arrears, but not to overtime work.

Outcome

Appeal upheld

Orders

  • Judgment set aside
  • Claim for terminal dues granted

Remedies

  • Service pay of Ksh.50,000
  • Unpaid leave of Ksh.70,000
  • Public holidays of Ksh.73,333
  • Salary arrears of Ksh.25,000
  • Costs of the suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (6)
  • Mbukha v CRJE (East Africa) Limited
  • Hamisa v Karisa
  • Nyonga v China City Company Limited
  • Terry Muigai v SKF Kenya Limited
  • Joseph Irungu Kimani v Kensalt Limited
  • Daniel Njuguna Mwangi v De La Rue Currency Security Print Limited
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case