SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mburu v Gillys Security Investigations Services Ltd (Cause 779 of 2018) [2024] KEELRC 1348 (KLR) (6 June 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 1348 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1348
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1348 (KLR)
Decided
6 June 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant v RespondentCoramNZIOKI WA MAKAU
The court finds in favor of the claimant on the claims for underpayment, costs, interest, and a certificate of service.

Facts

Claimant Andrew Mungai Mburu claimed constructive dismissal and various employment-related claims against Respondent Gillys Security Investigations Services Ltd, alleging underpayment, lack of house allowance, and unfair dismissal.

Issues

  • Whether the claim is time-barred
  • Whether the claimant was unfairly and constructively dismissed
  • Whether the claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought
  • Who bears the cost of the suit

Reasoning

The court ruled that the claim is not time-barred and the claimant is entitled to underpayment for the period 2015 to 2016. The court also ordered the respondent to file a statement of employment within 21 days and awarded costs and interest.

Outcome

In favor of the claimant

Orders

  • Respondent to file a statement of employment within 21 days
  • Underpayment of Kshs. 78,875.30 awarded
  • Costs limited to the sum in (b) above
  • Interest at court rates on the sum in (b) above from date of judgment till payment in full
  • Certificate of service awarded

Remedies

  • Underpayment of Kshs. 78,875.30
  • Costs limited to the sum in (b) above
  • Interest at court rates on the sum in (b) above from date of judgment till payment in full
  • Certificate of service awarded

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case