SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Raichenah v Young Women’s Christian Association Of Kenya (Cause E499 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 13626 (KLR) (28 June 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 13626 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
13626
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 13626 (KLR)
Decided
28 June 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant seeks declaration of unfair termination and compensation, Respondent seeks dismissal of suit.CoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The termination was not unfair due to absence without permission on the date the claimant attended the training without permission. However, the claimant came back to the office immediately the same day of the training.

Facts

Claimant was employed as a Program Officer by the Respondent. She requested to attend a fundraising training, which was not approved due to lateness. She was later disciplined for absenteeism and negligence, and her contract was terminated. She claimed emotional trauma and financial difficulties.

Issues

  • Was the termination of the contract unfair?
  • What was the procedure followed by the Respondent?

Reasoning

The Court found that the claimant was not given permission to attend the training and was absent without permission only on the date of the training, not during her sick leaves. The Respondent complied with the due procedure of a notice and a hearing.

Outcome

The suit is hereby dismissed and each party to bear own costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case