SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ndolo v Umma University (Appeal E097 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 1393 (KLR) (13 June 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 1393 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1393
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1393 (KLR)
Decided
13 June 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Hon. Mrs. Gicheha Chief MagistrateCoramNZIOKI WA MAKAU
The appeal is dismissed as unmerited. The Appellant is awarded Kshs. 32,512.50 for severance pay, but no costs are awarded.

Facts

The Appellant, Francis Wambua Ndolo, was employed by Umma University as a security guard. The Respondent terminated his employment on the grounds of alleged redundancy. The Appellant claimed unlawful termination and sought various awards including severance pay, notice pay, and other terminal benefits.

Issues

  • Whether the termination of employment was lawful based on redundancy
  • Whether the Respondent followed the legal procedures for redundancy
  • Whether the Appellant was entitled to various terminal benefits

Reasoning

The Court found that the termination was based on a lawful redundancy process and that the Appellant was not entitled to additional terminal benefits as he did not provide evidence for them.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The Judgment of the Hon. Mrs. Gicheha Chief Magistrate is set aside
  • The Appellant is awarded Kshs. 32,512.50 for severance pay
  • No costs are awarded

Remedies

  • Severance pay of Kshs. 32,512.50

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Labour Relations Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case