SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Njaramba v Nairobi Water & Sewerage Company Limited (Cause 1414 of 2018) [2024] KEELRC 1584 (KLR) (21 June 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELRC 1584 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1584
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1584 (KLR)
Decided
21 June 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor DisputePostureRespondent seeks stay of execution of judgment pending appealCoramSC RUTTO
The Court grants the stay of execution pending appeal

Facts

Claimant was awarded Kshs. 2,127,590 and costs in a previous judgment for discrimination on disability. Respondent seeks stay of execution pending appeal and deposit of decretal sums in a joint interest-earning account.

Issues

  • Whether to grant stay of execution pending appeal
  • Whether substantial loss will result to the Respondent if the stay is not granted

Reasoning

The Court considers the principles of Order 42 rule 6(2) and the need to preserve the subject matter in dispute. The Respondent argues substantial loss due to double execution, while the Claimant argues no substantial loss as he is an employee.

Outcome

Stay of execution granted

Orders

  • Stay of execution of judgment dated 28th April 2023 pending hearing and determination of the Appeal
  • Deposit of decretal sums of Kshs. 2,127,590 and costs of Kshs. 335,740 in a joint interest-earning account pending the Hearing and determination of the Appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (2)
  • RWW vs EKW (2019) eKLR
  • James Wangalwa & Another v Agnes Naliaka Cheseto (2012) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case