SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kaugi v Absa Bank Kenya PLC (Cause E144 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 1732 (KLR) (9 July 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 1732 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1732
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1732 (KLR)
Decided
9 July 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeWrongful TerminationPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramJK GAKERI, Mbaru, Ndolo, Wilson
Holding

The court found that the Respondent had a performance management and scores rating system, but the Claimant's performance was not adequately addressed. The termination was found to be fair and the Claimant was not discriminated against.

Facts

Rita Wandia Kaugi was employed by Absa Bank Kenya PLC as a Bank Clerk and later as a Branch Manager for 33 years and 6 months. She was placed on a Performance Accelerator Plan (PAP) in 2020 and 2021 due to non-adherence to policy, lack of headcount, and delayed action on cases. Despite her performance being good until 2018, she was rated as underperforming in 2018 and subsequently terminated.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent had a performance management and scores rating system.
  2. Whether the Claimant was discriminated against by the Respondent.
  3. Whether termination of the Claimant’s employment was fair within the meaning of Section 45 of the Employment Act, 2007.
  4. Whether the Claimant was entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The court acknowledged the existence of the Respondent's performance management and scores rating system but noted that the Claimant's performance issues were not adequately addressed. The court found that the termination was fair and that the Claimant was not discriminated against.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case