SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ochieng v NCBA Bank Kenya PLC (Cause E630 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 1823 (KLR) (12 July 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 1823 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1823
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1823 (KLR)
Decided
12 July 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair TerminationPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramSC RUTTO
The Court found that the Claimant was not terminated from employment but rather resigned. The Claimant's claim for unfair/unlawful termination, severance pay, and accrued leave was dismissed.

Facts

The Claimant, Joseph Mkwanhah Ochieng, was employed by NIC Bank Kenya from January 2013. The bank merged with Commercial Bank of Africa (CBA) in September 2019, forming NCBA Bank Kenya. The Claimant was offered employment by the new bank but rejected it, citing his expectations and the increased responsibilities that came with the merger.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant was terminated from employment
  • If terminated, was the termination fair and lawful
  • Whether there is a case of discrimination and harassment
  • Is the Claimant entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The Court ruled that the Claimant rejected the new terms of employment offered by the Respondent, and thus, his employment was terminated by his own conduct. The Claimant's claim for unfair/unlawful termination was dismissed.

Outcome

The Claimant's claim was dismissed.

Orders

  • Accrued leave is awarded to the Claimant in the amount of Kshs. 91,870.80.
  • Each party bears their own costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case