SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Gathira v Rwathia Suppliers Ltd & 2 others (Cause E363 of 2021) [2024] KEELRC 1969 (KLR) (26 July 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 1969 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1969
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1969 (KLR)
Decided
26 July 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial
Holding

The Court finds that the Respondent failed to prove that the Claimant absconded duty, and thus the termination was unfair.

Facts

The Claimant, Elijah Mwangi Gathira, was employed by Rwathia Suppliers Ltd as a Senior Stock Clerk from June 2017 until September 2018. He was summarily dismissed and later arrested for stock variance. He claimed unfair dismissal and other damages.

Issues

  1. Whether the Claimant absconded duty or was unfairly terminated from employment.
  2. Whether the Claimant's prosecution was malicious.
  3. Is the Claimant entitled to the reliefs sought?

Reasoning

The Court held that the Respondent did not take reasonable steps to establish the Claimant's whereabouts after he absconded from work, and thus the termination was unfair.

Outcome

The Court declared the termination unfair and ordered the Respondent to pay damages and other relief.

Orders

  • Declaration of unfair termination
  • Payment of damages
  • Payment of leave pay
  • Interest on damages
  • Costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Damages
  • Leave pay
  • Interest
  • Costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Mary Mumbi Kariuki v Director, Pamoja Women Development Programme (2015) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case