SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ng’ang’a v Sinopec International Petrolium Services Corporations Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal 57 of 2017) [2024] KEELRC 1978 (KLR) (31 July 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELRC 1978 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1978
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1978 (KLR)
Decided
31 July 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppellant seeks review of the lower court's judgment awarding interest from the date of the lower court's judgmentCoramHS WASILWA
Holding

The court reviews its judgment and indicates that costs of the appeal and of the lower court will be borne by the Respondents and interest be paid with effect from the date of the lower court's judgment.

Facts

The Appellant sought review of the lower court's judgment awarding interest from the date of the lower court's judgment, which was not addressed in the appeal.

Issues

  1. Award of interest from the date of the lower court's judgment
  2. Delay in determining the appeal

Reasoning

The court finds that the award of interest from the date of the lower court's judgment was an error and allows the review.

Outcome

The court reviews its judgment and indicates that costs of the appeal and of the lower court will be borne by the Respondents and interest be paid with effect from the date of the lower court's judgment.

Orders

  • Costs of the appeal and of the lower court will be borne by the Respondents
  • Interest be paid with effect from the date of the lower court's judgment

Remedies

  • Review of the judgment and award of interest

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Act, 2011
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016
Cases cited (1)
  • Sarder Mohammed V Charan Singgh Nand Singh and Another [1959] EA 793
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case