SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kioko v Technical University of Kenya & another (Employment and Labour Relations Petition E173 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2127 (KLR) (26 July 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELRC 2127 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2127
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2127 (KLR)
Decided
26 July 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetitionPostureAppeal from a previous rulingCoramAN MWAURE
Holding

The Court granted the Petitioner/Applicant's request for review due to the missing supplementary affidavits and submissions, and granted the restraining order.

Facts

The Petitioner/Applicant filed an application seeking to review a ruling from May 17, 2024, which dismissed her application to prevent the 2nd Respondent from expelling her from the National Delegate Conference.

Issues

  1. Whether the Petitioner/Applicant is entitled to review the ruling of May 17, 2024
  2. Whether the Petitioner/Applicant is entitled to an order restraining the 2nd Respondent from executing the May 17, 2024 orders

Reasoning

The Court found that the Petitioner/Applicant had submitted new and important evidence (supplementary affidavits and submissions) that was not available at the time of the original ruling.

Outcome

The Court granted the Petitioner/Applicant's request for review and the restraining order.

Orders

  • Order for review of the ruling of May 17, 2024
  • Order restraining the 2nd Respondent from executing the May 17, 2024 orders

Remedies

  • Review of the ruling of May 17, 2024
  • Restraining order against the 2nd Respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Evidence Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Paul Mwaniki v National Hospital Insurance Fund Board of Management [2020] eKLR
  • Republic v Barisa Wayu Matuguda [2011] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case