SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Karithi v Karumo Technical Training Institute (Cause E020 of 2021) [2024] KEELRC 218 (KLR) (9 February 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 218 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
218
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 218 (KLR)
Decided
9 February 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair TerminationPostureClaimant vs Respondent (Karumo Technical Training Institute)CoramONESMUS N MAKAU
Holding

The claimant was not unlawfully laid off, as his contract lapsed on 31st January 2020 and he declined renewal in November 2020. The claim for damages for unlawful redundancy and salary arrears for April 2020 to January 2021 fails. However, the claim for a certificate of service is granted.

Facts

Claimant was employed as a trainer/tutor by the respondent with a monthly gross salary of Kshs.25,000.00. The contract was based on fixed term contracts of one year. The respondent closed all schools and colleges due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and the claimant declined renewal of his contract in May 2020. The schools reopened in November 2020, and the respondent issued renewal offers to all BOG trainers, including the claimant, but he declined.

Issues

  1. Whether the claimant was unlawfully laid off
  2. Whether he is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The respondent's evidence was found convincing, and the claimant's contract lapsed on 31st January 2020. The claimant was offered renewal in November 2020 but declined due to the lockdown. The burden of proving redundancy is on the claimant, but the evidence does not support this.

Outcome

The claimant's suit substantially fails, and he is not awarded damages or salary arrears. The claimant is granted a certificate of service.

Orders

  • Grant of a certificate of service
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case