SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kilonzo v IPAS Africa Alliance (Cause E424 of 2021) [2024] KEELRC 2210 (KLR) (18 September 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 2210 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2210
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2210 (KLR)
Decided
18 September 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramB. O. Manani, JK GAKERI, Maraga
The Court held that the termination of the Claimant's employment on account of redundancy was unfair.

Facts

The Claimant, Margaret N Kilonzo, was employed by the Respondent, IPAS Africa Alliance, as Alliance Program Manager from March 4, 2019. The Respondent terminated her employment on December 11, 2020, citing redundancy due to reduced donor funding. The Claimant alleged the termination was unfair.

Issues

  • Whether termination of the Claimant's employment on account of redundancy was unfair.
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondent had no substantive justifications for the redundancy and did not comply with the Employment Act's requirements for a fair redundancy process.

Outcome

The Court ordered the Respondent to reinstate the Claimant and pay compensation.

Orders

  • Reinstatement of the Claimant
  • Compensation for the Claimant

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (3)
  • Kenya Airways Ltd V Aviation & Allied Workers Union (2014) eKLR
  • Freight In Time Ltd V Rosebell Wambui Munene (2018) eKLR
  • Barclays Bank of Kenya Ltd & another V Gladys Muthoni & 20 others (2018) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case