SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ansari v Capcom Limited & another (Cause E134 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2319 (KLR) (26 September 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 2319 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2319
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2319 (KLR)
Decided
26 September 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstructive DismissalPostureOriginal TrialCoramM MBARŨ, J
Holding

The claimant did not meet the threshold for a claim of constructive dismissal.

Facts

Mohamed Arshad Ansari was employed by Capcom Limited as a technical manager and later as a general manager. He worked with the company from March 2011 until January 2022. The claimant alleged that he was not provided with a house allowance or housing, did not take his annual leave, and was subjected to intolerable working conditions.

Issues

  1. Whether the claimant met the threshold for a claim of constructive dismissal.
  2. Whether the claimant's vehicle was taken from him by the respondents at the instigation of the 2nd respondent who took over the running of the company in May 2022 upon the demise of the founding director.

Reasoning

The court found that the claimant did not demonstrate intolerable working conditions leading to termination of employment through a resignation. The claimant's vehicle was not taken from him by the respondents, and the salary reduction was not significant enough to constitute a repudiatory breach.

Outcome

The claimant's case for constructive dismissal was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Coca-Cola East & Central Africa Limited v Maria Kagai Ligaga [2015] eKLR
  • Herbert Wafula Waswa v Kenya Wildlife Services [2020] eKLR
  • Enid Nkirote Mukire v Kenya Yearbook Editorial Board [2022] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case