SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Boro & another v Nairobi City County (Judicial Review E015 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 2437 (KLR) (30 September 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELRC 2437 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2437
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2437 (KLR)
Decided
30 September 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureAppeal from a previous judgmentCoramAN MWAURE
The court grants the order of mandamus to compel the respondent to pay the decretal sum and interest

Facts

The applicants were awarded a sum of Kshs 1,508,245.97 in a previous judgment dated July 5, 2019, but the respondent has not paid the amount. The applicants seek an order of mandamus compelling the respondent to pay the amount.

Issues

  • Whether the respondent should be compelled to pay the decretal sum
  • Whether the applicants have a remedy if the respondent fails to pay the amount

Reasoning

The court finds that the respondent should have settled the judgment and that the applicants deserve to receive the fruit of their judgment.

Outcome

The court grants the order of mandamus

Orders

  • Order of mandamus to compel the respondent to pay the decretal sum and interest

Remedies

  • Payment of the decretal sum and interest

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Kisya Investments Ltd v Attorney General & Another [2005] eKLR
  • Republic v Attorney General & Another exparte James Alfred Koroso [2013] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case