SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Njuguna & another v Equity Bank Kenya Limited (Cause E023 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2577 (KLR) (24 October 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELRC 2577 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2577
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2577 (KLR)
Decided
24 October 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAccess to Information ApplicationPostureAppeal from the Commission on Administrative JusticeCoramBOM MANANI
The court declines the application because it has been presented prematurely and in violation of the principle of exhaustion of alternative remedies.

Facts

The Claimants, Erick Muriithi Njuguna and Patrice Njoroge Kiuru, sought access to documents from Equity Bank Kenya Limited, the Respondent, related to their employment relationship. The Respondent opposed the application, citing non-relevance and confidentiality of some documents.

Issues

  • Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court has jurisdiction to entertain the application for access to information.
  • Whether the application was filed prematurely and in violation of the principle of exhaustion of alternative remedies.

Reasoning

The court follows the procedure prescribed under the Access to Information Act, which requires preliminary requests for information to be made to the Commission on Administrative Justice before the High Court can entertain the request.

Outcome

The application is dismissed.

Orders

  • The Claimants are asked to pursue their request for information in accordance with the procedure under the Access to Information Act.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Fair Administrative Action Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case