SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Musyoki v Lukenya University (Cause E002 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2833 (KLR) (15 November 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 2833 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2833
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2833 (KLR)
Decided
15 November 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant v RespondentCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The court finds that the claimant was in a contract of service and not a consultancy, thus PAYE and not withholding tax is deductible. The total amount owed to the claimant is Kshs. 679,200.00.

Facts

The claimant, Athanas Muia Musyoki, was employed by Lukenya University as a part-time lecturer from April 2019 to September 2022. The claimant alleged non-payment of salary arrears and sought a declaration that his fees or salary should be subjected to 5% withholding tax and not 30% PAYE applicable to full-time employees. The respondent, Lukenya University, admitted employing the claimant but disputed the amount of salary arrears and the withholding tax rate.

Issues

  • Non-payment of salary arrears
  • Applicability of withholding tax vs PAYE
  • Transport allowances

Reasoning

The court determined that the parties were in a contract of service, not a consultancy, and thus PAYE and not withholding tax is deductible. The claimant's claim for 5% withholding tax was not established.

Outcome

The respondent is ordered to pay the claimant Kshs. 679,200.00 less due PAYE by 15.12.2024 and deliver due documents showing the remission of deducted PAYE.

Orders

  • The respondent to pay the claimant Kshs. 679,200.00 less due PAYE by 15.12.2024 and failing interest to run thereon at Court rates from the date of filing the suit until full payment.
  • The respondent to deliver to the claimant due documents showing the remission of the deducted PAYE.
  • Each party to bear own costs of the suit.

Remedies

  • Remission of deducted PAYE by the respondent to the claimant.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case