SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Henry & 4 others v County Government of Vihiga (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 36 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2852 (KLR) (14 November 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 2852 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2852
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2852 (KLR)
Decided
14 November 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureAppeal from a previous judgmentCoramJW KELI, Mativo
The Court finds that the claimants are employees of the respondent and that their rights were violated. The claimants are awarded salary arrears and interest.

Facts

The claimants were clinical officers who were allegedly employed by the County Government of Vihiga in 2019, but their rights were allegedly violated and they were not paid their salaries and allowances.

Issues

  • Whether the claimants were employees of the respondent
  • Whether the claimants' rights were violated by the respondent
  • Whether the claimants were entitled to reliefs sought

Reasoning

The Court found that the claimants were employed by the respondent and that their rights were violated, leading to the award of salary arrears and interest.

Outcome

The claimants are awarded salary arrears and interest.

Orders

  • Payment of salary arrears for 20 months for total sum of Kshs. 1,635,600 less statutory deductions.
  • Interest is awarded from the date of judgment until payment in full.
  • Costs to the claimants.

Remedies

  • Salary arrears
  • Interest
  • Costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • County Government Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Kenya Union of Clinical Officers & 76 others v County Government of Vihiga (Bungoma Employment and Labour Relations Court Cause 32 of 2021)
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case