SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Union of Clinical Officers & 76 others v County Government of Vihiga & another (Employment and Labour Relations Claim 32 of 2021) [2024] KEELRC 455 (KLR) (29 February 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELRC 455 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
455
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 455 (KLR)
Decided
29 February 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour Relations ClaimPostureRespondent's Notice of Motion ApplicationCoramJustice JW KELI, Visram
The Court upholds the Court of Appeal decision in Peter Kirika Githaiga & another v Betty Rashid [2016] e KLR, stating that it is not mandatory to annex the decree in proceedings before this court.

Facts

The case involves a dispute between the Kenya Union of Clinical Officers and the County Government of Vihiga regarding costs and interest on salary arrears.

Issues

  • Whether the Respondents' application is merited and whether the orders sought in the motion should be granted.
  • Whether the Claimants' Notice of preliminary objection is sustainable.

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal decision in Peter Kirika Githaiga & another v Betty Rashid [2016] e KLR was applied, stating that it is not mandatory to annex the decree in proceedings before this court.

Outcome

The application for review is granted.

Orders

  • The court shall have power to review its judgments, awards, orders or decrees in accordance with the Rules.
  • An application for review of a decree or order of the court under subparagraphs (b), (c) or (d) shall be made to the Judge who passed the decree or made the order sought to be reviewed to any other judge if that judge is not attached to the court station.

Remedies

  • The court may review its decision to conform to the findings of the review or quash its decision and order that the suit be heard again.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (procedure) rules
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (2)
  • Suleiman Murunga v Nilestar Holdings Limited & another [2015]e KLR
  • Peter Kirika Githaiga & another v Betty Rashid [2016] e KLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case