SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Secretary, County Government of Kisumu & another; Mwamu (Exparte) (Judicial Review E041 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 601 (KLR) (13 March 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 601 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
601
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 601 (KLR)
Decided
13 March 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramRADIDO
The Motion is struck out with no order on costs, as the ex-parte applicant did not comply with the requirements of Order 53 Rule 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Act.

Facts

The ex-parte applicant, James Aggrey Mwamu, was awarded Kshs 1,470,000/- in Cause No. 30 of 2020. A Certicate of Order was issued on 1 February 2023, and a Certicate of Costs was issued on 11 April 2023. The ex-parte applicant now seeks an order of mandamus.

Issues

  • Whether the ex-parte applicant complied with the requirements of Order 53 Rule 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Act.
  • Whether the Respondents should be compelled to settle the decretal sum and costs.

Reasoning

The ex-parte applicant failed to file a Statutory Statement as required by Order 53 Rule 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Act, and the Respondents did not participate in the proceedings.

Outcome

The Motion is struck out with no order on costs.

Orders

  • The Motion dated is struck out with no order on costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Government Proceedings Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case