SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sunrise Hauliers Limited v Motaroki (Appeal E019 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 631 (KLR) (29 February 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELRC 631 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
631
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 631 (KLR)
Decided
29 February 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a decision of the Labour CourtCoramJW KELI
The court denied the application for stay of execution pending appeal.

Facts

Sunrise Hauliers Limited's motor vehicle was auctioned by Remma Auctioneers in Kisumu in the execution of a decree (BGM CMCC No 584 of 2016). The company filed for review of the judgment, but the court denied the stay of execution pending appeal.

Issues

  • Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the orders of stay of execution pending appeal are merited.
  • Whether the applicant can exercise both the Right of Appeal and Review at the same time.
  • Whether the Appellant has met the conditions for stay of Execution.

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant cannot file an appeal when a review exists on the same grounds, and that the applicant has not met the conditions for stay of execution.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution pending appeal is denied.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (6)
  • Nicholas Stephen Okaka v Alfred Waga Wesonga
  • Gab International Construction Co; Ltd v Zachary Kabucho Ndungu
  • David Kihara Murage v Jacinta Karuana Nyangi
  • Mossy Khaemba Muchanga & Davis Wabwile Muchanga v Paul Lutoti Khawanga
  • Kenya Shell Ltd v Benjamin Kibiru
  • Antoine Ndianye v African Virtual University
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case