SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Cheruiyot & 6 others v Kericho Water & Sanitation Company Limited(KEWASCO) (Appeal E005 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 660 (KLR) (13 March 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 660 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
660
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 660 (KLR)
Decided
13 March 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureRespondent appealed a judgment and decree issued by the Honourable E. K. Makori-CM in Kericho Magistrates Court.CoramHS WASILWA
The Court held that the learned trial magistrate erred in law and fact by finding the employment contracts illegal due to non-advertising.

Facts

The appellants filed a suit against the respondent alleging that the employment contracts between them and the respondent were illegal due to non-advertising of positions, while the respondent argued that the contracts were valid and met all elements of an employment.

Issues

  • Whether the learned trial magistrate erred in law and fact by finding the employment contracts illegal due to non-advertising.
  • Whether the learned trial magistrate erred in law and fact by finding the employment contracts valid and meeting all elements of an employment.

Reasoning

The Court found that the employment contracts were valid and met all elements of an employment, thus the non-advertising was not a valid reason to invalidate the contracts.

Outcome

The appeal was allowed, and the judgment and decree were set aside.

Orders

  • The learned trial magistrate's finding that the employment contracts were illegal was overturned.
  • A proper finding was made regarding the validity of the employment contracts.

Remedies

  • The judgment and decree were set aside.
  • Costs were provided for.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case