SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Waiyego v HFC Bank Limited (Cause E008 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 727 (KLR) (5 April 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 727 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
727
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 727 (KLR)
Decided
5 April 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair TerminationPostureAppeal from a summary dismissalCoramON MAKAU
The termination was unfair.

Facts

The claimant, John Waiyego, was employed by HFC Bank Limited as a Branch Operations Manager at Thika. He was dismissed on 19th April 2022 for gross misconduct. He brought a suit alleging unfair termination and sought general damages, salary due, and 3 months' salary in lieu of notice.

Issues

  • Whether the termination was unfair and unlawful.
  • Whether the reliefs sought are merited.

Reasoning

The termination was based on the claimant's failure to declare outside business interests, acting in conflict of interest, operating outside business during office hours, and breaching Cash Management Controls. The court found that the employer failed to prove the reason for termination was valid and fair.

Outcome

Claimant's suit for unfair termination and other reliefs is upheld.

Orders

  • Dismissal of the respondent's prayer to dismiss the suit with costs.

Remedies

  • General damages for unfair termination.
  • Salary due and owing.
  • 3 months' salary in lieu of notice.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case